As a concept I don't approve of metablogging too much. Now that I have so lightly tossed that word into the conversation, let me explain what it means. Unless you know already, in which case we are finished here. I won't be making any more pertinent points really and you can go home now, Elvis really has left the building.
But if you don't, well, metablogging is the boring process wherein the blogger blogs about the act of blogging itself. Gah! That's right. So they talk about why they aren't blogging, or what they like blogging about, or what they'd really like to blog about if only they had the time/patience/energy to do so. Sometimes they write useful stuff to do with blogging too (hard to believe, I know), I guess, though one can never be too sure.
As I was saying, I don't like it.
And so what is killing me right now is whether this post counts as being a metablogging post or not.
***
Some of my blogger friends have been discussing whether opening their innermost secrets (in other words, FB/Orkut profiles) to readers of their blogs is a good idea. I have an only somewhat related point to make here and since that by itself is a historical event, kindly stand at attention and put hand to heart.
Right, so what I say is this - it doesn't matter whether you are anonymous or blogging under your real name, it also doesn't matter what your 'I want to make franship with you' policy is. If you're not comfortable with people (or even just that one person) knowing about it ('it' being absolutely anything in this world), don't put it on the internet. Yeah, it's just as simple as that. If you fear something will come out, well, it will. It really is a matter of time. Nothing remains a secret on the internet beyond a point. It is one of the commandments that were given to the forefathers of the world wide web and they told me so personally. (They did too.) So yes, even if you blog under a pseudonym, behave (write) as if you are writing under your very real name (including you, Champakali) and the people reading you are friends as well the ones you'd much rather not run into a dark alley at night.
What about all your personal thoughts, the deep/dark/both secrets that want to spill out of your gut, the urge to put it all there - well, my friend, that is what your dog-eared diary and the Harrison taala is for. Of course you still run the risk of being discovered (specially if you have a couple of nosy siblings running riot) but at least there's no Google to aid them.
Of course, though I keep saying 'you', I actually mean 'me', but if you are the kind of person who doesn't mind advice being tossed your way, consider it given. Point over. Let's move on.
***
But if you don't, well, metablogging is the boring process wherein the blogger blogs about the act of blogging itself. Gah! That's right. So they talk about why they aren't blogging, or what they like blogging about, or what they'd really like to blog about if only they had the time/patience/energy to do so. Sometimes they write useful stuff to do with blogging too (hard to believe, I know), I guess, though one can never be too sure.
As I was saying, I don't like it.
And so what is killing me right now is whether this post counts as being a metablogging post or not.
***
Some of my blogger friends have been discussing whether opening their innermost secrets (in other words, FB/Orkut profiles) to readers of their blogs is a good idea. I have an only somewhat related point to make here and since that by itself is a historical event, kindly stand at attention and put hand to heart.
Right, so what I say is this - it doesn't matter whether you are anonymous or blogging under your real name, it also doesn't matter what your 'I want to make franship with you' policy is. If you're not comfortable with people (or even just that one person) knowing about it ('it' being absolutely anything in this world), don't put it on the internet. Yeah, it's just as simple as that. If you fear something will come out, well, it will. It really is a matter of time. Nothing remains a secret on the internet beyond a point. It is one of the commandments that were given to the forefathers of the world wide web and they told me so personally. (They did too.) So yes, even if you blog under a pseudonym, behave (write) as if you are writing under your very real name (including you, Champakali) and the people reading you are friends as well the ones you'd much rather not run into a dark alley at night.
What about all your personal thoughts, the deep/dark/both secrets that want to spill out of your gut, the urge to put it all there - well, my friend, that is what your dog-eared diary and the Harrison taala is for. Of course you still run the risk of being discovered (specially if you have a couple of nosy siblings running riot) but at least there's no Google to aid them.
Of course, though I keep saying 'you', I actually mean 'me', but if you are the kind of person who doesn't mind advice being tossed your way, consider it given. Point over. Let's move on.
***